IVWS Panel ÒStreet-Life: Woolf and Public
Spaces,Ó MLA 2006
ÒI Salute Thee; PassingÓ:
Generic Hybridity and Urban Space in
WoolfÕs ÒOde Written Partly in ProseÓ
Adam Hammond, University of Toronto
While
WoolfÕs ÒThe Narrow Bridge of ArtÓ is by no means alone in discussing the
problem of modernity in relation to that of public space, it is decidedly
peculiar in subordinating its analysis of both to questions of genre. The 1927
essay defines modernity by an ÒattitudeÓ — one of contrast, discord, and
incongruity — to which it assigns a very specific cause: Òthe failure of
poetryÓ (218). To complete the causal chain, it explains this generic failure
by proposing a walk through a city street: Ò[t]he long avenue of brick is cut
up into boxes, each of which is inhabited by a different human being who has
put locks on his doors and bolts on his windows to ensure some privacy, yet is
linked to his fellows by wires which pass overhead, by waves of sound which
pour through the roofÓ (222).
Where
Walter Benjamin emphasizes the impetus to separate public from private space in
the nineteenth century, what interests Woolf in the twentieth century are the
generic consequences of the fact that the distinction no longer holds. The
paradox of proximity by which residents are brought into increasingly alienated
concentration and in which the jealously guarded vestiges of personal space are
permeated on all sides by the technologies of communication leads, in WoolfÕs
analysis, to a crisis of genre. If poetry had once been adequate to the
representation of the private and the personal and prose to the public and the
interpersonal, neither is able independently to capture Òthe quick and queer
emotions which are bred in small separate roomsÓ (223). Recognizing the problem
of modernity as an effect of genre, however, ÒThe Narrow Bridge of ArtÓ
proposes also to resolve it through genre: with a poetic prose that would
capture in its hybridity the sneer and contrast of an age whose boundaries of
public and private have been pushed to obsolescence.
While
much of WoolfÕs corpus can be regarded as venturing toward such poetic prose,
there is perhaps no more conspicuous example of her generic hybridity than the
ÒOde Written Partly in Prose on Seeing the Name of Cutbush Above a ButcherÕs Shop
in Pentonville," written in 1934 and never published. WoolfÕs only ÒpoemÓ
offers an extremely self-conscious — and self-consciously poetic —
account of the life of a butcher, presenting the ÒproseÓ spaces of John Cutbush
(Pentonville, the shop, the high street, the public fair) through the ÒpoeticÓ
lyric voice of an itinerant narrator markedly higher in class. While the few
extant readings of the ÒOdeÓ present it as classist and ironic, I propose that
it can more productively be regarded as an ambivalent but earnest investigation
of the problem of representing urban space. While its emphatically mixed genre,
its lyric renderings of public spaces, and its novelistic narrative of
emotional life suggest a deliberate attempt at instantiating the prescriptions
of ÒThe Narrow Bridge of Art,Ó the ÒOdeÓ ends by rejecting generic aims of
capturing, redeeming, or stably expressing the spatial confusions of the modern
city. As its concluding line, ÒI salute thee; passing,Ó suggests, the ÒOdeÓ
celebrates the aesthetic and political possibilities opened up in the hybrid
spaces of urban modernity precisely by refusing to master them.
Works Cited
Benjamin, Walter. ÒParis, the Capital of
the Nineteenth Century <ExposŽ of 1935>.Ó The Arcades Project.
Ed. Rolf Tiedemann. Trans.
Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin.
Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard UP, 1999. 3-13.
Woolf, Virginia. ÒThe Narrow Bridge of
Art.Ó Collected Essays.
Ed. Leonard Woolf. Vol. 2. London: Chatto & Windus, 1966-69. 218-229.
————. ÒOde Written Partly in Prose on Seeing the Name of Cutbush Above a ButcherÕs Shop in Pentonvile.Ó A Haunted House: The Complete Shorter Fiction. Ed. Susan Dick. New York: Vintage, 2003. 231-235.