John Wallis
When the Pinciu lottery dealt me the John Wallis number, I got a winner! John Wallis proved to give me a valuable opportunity to reflect on mathematics both in the broad context of all human conceptual constructs, and as a unifying thread throughout the diverse fabric that has been my life.
Biographical Sketch
John Wallis was born in 1616, the son of a priest of the Church of England, also John Wallis, and of his land-owning wife, Joanna Chapman. Later in his life, the inheritance of a valuable estate from his mother was to give John Wallis fils financial independence.
John Wallis was born during the last period of convulsions
that moved
John Wallis’ early studies included logic, but not mathematics, which the best schools of his day did not think warranted a place in the curriculum! To quote from Wallis’ autobiography: For mathematics, at that time with us, were scarce looked on as academical studies, but rather mechanical - as the business of traders, merchants, seamen, carpenters, surveyors of lands and the like.[1] (Many of my Algebra II students no doubt wish that was still the case!) It was not until he was 15 that John Wallis first learned the rules of arithmetic from his brother.
At the age of 15, he became a student at Holbeach’s school,
where he became proficient in Latin, Greek and Hebrew. He entered
In 1642, a chance event that was to transform Wallis’ future took place:
... one evening at supper, a letter in cipher was brought in, relating
to the capture of
The important contribution Wallis’ cryptographical efforts made to Parliamentary cause helped secure his future when Cromwell and the forces of Parliament defeated Charles I. They also bring to mind the contributions of Alan Turing to breaking the Nazi codes during the Second World War and hastening the end of that horrific conflict.
In 1644, Wallis became secretary to the clergy
at
In
1649, Wallis was appointed by Cromwell to the Savilian Chair of geometry
at
Wallis’ non-mathematical works include many
religious works, a book on etymology and grammar Grammatica linguae
Anglicanae (
Mathematical Contributions[3]
Wallis was the most influential English mathematician before Newton. He studied the works of Kepler, Cavalieri, Roberval, Torricelli and Descartes, and contributed substantially to the origins of calculus.
Wallis's most famous work was Arithmetica infinitorum which he published in 1656. In this work Wallis established the formula π/2 = (2.2.4.4.6.6.8.8.10..)/(1.3.3.5.5.7.7.9.9...)
In his Tract on Conic Sections (1655) Wallis described the curves that are obtained as cross sections by cutting a cone with a plane as properties of algebraic coordinates.
Wallis developed methods in the style of Descartes analytical treatment and he was the first English mathematician to use these new techniques. This work is also famed for the first use of the symbol ∞ for infinity. He is generally credited as the originator of the idea of the number line where numbers are represented geometrically in a line with the positive numbers increasing to the right and negative numbers to the left.[4]
Wallis was also an important early historian of mathematics and in his Treatise on Algebra he gives a wealth of valuable historical material. However the most important feature of this work, which appeared in 1685, is that it brought to mathematicians the work of Harriot in a clear exposition, presented for the first time by someone who really understood the significance of his contributions.
In his Treatise on Algebra, Wallis accepts negative roots and complex roots.
Wallis made other contributions to the history of mathematics by restoring some ancient Greek texts such as Ptolemy's Harmonics, Aristarchus's On the magnitudes and distances of the sun and moon and Archimedes' Sand-reckoner.
Finally, the contribution that led to Wallis’ inclusion in our textbook is
Wallis’ Postulate: Given any triangle ∆ ABC and given any segment DE.
There exists a ∆ DEF (having DE as one of its sides) that is similar to ∆
ABC.[5]
Wallis proved
Reflections on Wallis and Mathematics
While I no longer even aspire to the creativity and productivity that marked the life of John Wallis, I do share with him some of his intellectual history. I double majored in college in mathematics and religion. In college, I studied Latin, Greek, Hebrew, French and German. Like Wallis, I went on to graduate work in religious studies, in my case in the origins of Christianity, in which I have a Ph.D. After a first career as a professor of religious studies, I made a radical change and became an actuary, working for ten years as an applied mathematician. After that, another lurch took me to law school and work first as a tax lawyer and then as a specialist in investment contracts. Now, another change and I am studying Geometry in order to qualify for certification as a teacher of high school mathematics, which I am already during under a Duration Shortage Area Permit.
My own life experience and my reflection on the work of Wallis convince me that gap often alluded to between verbal and mathematical skills is illusory. Mathematics is a collection of languages, belonging certainly to the same family, as Italian and French are both related to Latin, but some of these languages can be encoded and decoded without the need to know others. For example, we can do Neutral Geometry when we might not be able to do complex analysis.
All languages require unproved assumptions about meaning; all languages have vocabulary and rules of grammar, rules as it were of construction. Meaning is constructed by proper application of the rules of grammar to the vocabulary and presuppositions. The construction and expression of meaning is what mathematics has in common with every human language. We who are teachers do our students a grave, disabling disservice, when we fail to stress the essential similarity of mathematics to all learning.
[1] C J
Scriba, The autobiograhy of John Wallis, F.R.S., Notes and Records
[2] Ibid.
[3] This section is a lightly edited excerpt from the website referenced in footnote 1.
[5] Greenberg, p. 52.
[6] Ibid., p. 154.