Exam #2 Study Guide – Ethical Choice
Introduction – Be able to summarize the
various positions listed and their main arguments.
Mappes
Kant’s end-in-itself formulation of the categorical
imperative
Why undermining someone’s voluntary informed consent is using
them in an immoral manner.
The two types of deception
Occurrent and disposition
coercion, and coercive offers
The difference between an offer and a threat
How deception and each of the types of coercion undermine
voluntary informed consent.
Ericcson
Why our negative attitudes about prostitution are the
problem rather than prostitution itself.
The sentimentalist charge and Ericcson’s two responses to it.
The paternalistic charge and Ericcson’s response.
The ineradicability
of prostitution and the harms that result from trying to outlaw it.
Punzo
Punzo’s critique of the liberal position: Uncommitted sex
leads to depersonalization. What distinguishes sex from other activities.
Why a morality of aspiration is
preferable to merely avoiding harms.
Existential
integrity as the ethical principle guiding sexual activity.
Punzo’s view on preceremonial
sex: Is he a conventionalist? Sex with love?
West
Feminist claims about the status of women in society.
Reasons why women consent to undesired
sex.
Harms that may result from this.
The various senses in which homosexuality
is supposed to be unnatural and Corvino’s claim that
they are not morally relevant.
Homosexuality’s purported harms to individual practictioners, children, and society and Corvino’s responses.
Knight
How same-sex marriage undermines the institutions of
marriage and family.
Are same-sex marriage and interracial marriage analogous?
Rauch
The purpose of marriage. Why the
purpose is not procreation or love.
Essay Topics
1. State your view on sexual morality in relation to love,
commitment, and marriage. Provide arguments to support your view and explain
why your view is preferable to the other main positions.
2. Pick one of the following normative theories (Kant’s
ethics, utilitarianism, virtue ethics, natural law
theory) and use it to argue for liberalism, conventionalism, and the sex with
love position. Then explain which of these arguments you think is the best and
why.
3. Is homosexuality or same-sex marriage morally permissible?
State your views and defend it vigorously with evidence and arguments. How is
homosexuality relevantly different than sexual acts that you think are moral?
How are heterosexual romantic relationships relevantly
different than same-sex ones?