M 3/18 Erickson (Reading Packet) – The morality of prostitution

1. Ericsson argues that there is nothing morally wrong with most forms of prostitution. Instead, the real problem lies in our attitudes toward prostitution. What does he mean by this?

2. How does Ericsson respond to the sentimentalist charge that prostitution is immoral because it makes sex “impoverished, cold, and impersonal”?

3. Ericsson argues against the paternalistic charge that the hazardous working conditions of the prostitute should be regulated like other dangerous jobs because prostitutes provide a socially valuable service. Is his argument convincing? Why or why not?