Exam #1 Study Guide – Business Ethics
The difference between
morality and ethics
Define consequentialism,
deontology, utilitarianism, ethical egoism, Kant’s ethics, and virtue ethics.
Kant – The
difference between hypothetical and categorical imperatives, the universal law
and end in itself formulations of the categorical imperative, objection to Kant
– lying to save an innocent person’s life.
Utilitarianism
– Intellectual and bodily pleasures, objection to utilitarianism – it doesn’t
respect individual rights
Virtue Ethics
– Importance of habit, education, and environment; the morality of one’s
tendency to act rather than the morality of an individual act; example of
individual virtues. How is virtue ethics holistic? What role does context and
judgment play in its moral determinations?
Carr and Gillespie – Is there a special ethics
in business? What do business and poker have in common? According to Gillespie,
what are the two criteria for determining whether it is one’s duty to do what
is right? Even if it isn’t one’s duty, is there still something wrong with the
situation?
Bird and Waters
– The causes and harms of management muteness
Bok –
What are the potential harms and benefits of whistleblowing?
What criteria should we use to determine whether whistleblowing
is morally justified?
Crisp – Why
does he think that persuasive advertising is wrong in all forms? What does it
mean to undermine one’s autonomy and rationality? What cases of informative
advertising does he criticize?
Essay Questions:
1. Do you think that lying is
ever justified in business? Explain your reasons. Consider the cases of lying
in negotiations, lying in advertising, and lying to employees. How can we
distinguish between acceptable and unacceptable forms of lying in each of these
cases?
2. Define whistleblowing,
discuss its potential harms and benefits, and provide criteria for determining
when one should blow the whistle, illustrating them with one case in which one
should and one case in which one shouldn’t.
3. In addition to deception,
are there other marketing techniques that are morally unjustified? Give
examples and explain what makes these cases immoral, and formulate this into
clear criteria that will distinguish moral and immoral cases of marketing.